Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Do you regard Sarah Palin's hunting from a helicopter as an overall negative in the campaign?

yes, worse, she used tax-dollars to keep it flying





anyone with a basic understanding of wildlife understands that there exists a predator-prey balance, when you take out the predators life for the prey goes to **** and they end up diseased and smashed on the hood of your car.





not to mention, shooting from an aircraft is incredibly inaccurate and leads to misery for the hunted animal.





Sarah palin used tax-dollars to encourage animal cruelty and trashing the environment, the state of alaska was sued and the state lost.Do you regard Sarah Palin's hunting from a helicopter as an overall negative in the campaign?
Not really?





If I recall correctly, hunting animals is a great way for population control, thus keeping the wolf/deer/caribou or whatever they have at even levels.





People hunt all the time. I don't get why anyone puts the helicopter in there whenever they talk about Sarah hunting, do helicopters make the hunting more immoral or what? I just don't see the evil connection between a helicopter and hunting. Do you regard Sarah Palin's hunting from a helicopter as an overall negative in the campaign?
Yes. Chasing an animal until the point of exhaustion when you yourself are not expending any energy, then shooting it, is not ';hunting'; by any stretch. I find it beyond pathetic.





Does she eat the animal or is it just for the thrill? It seems similar to chasing a human in a car while they are on foot and them shooting them while they are unarmed. It isn't hunting. It's sick. She isn't a pioneer or a maverick - more like a bully.



It's nice to see a dyed-in-the-wool pro-lifer going on a hunting jolly. It really shows up the utter hypocrisy of their ill-formed argument.








The woman is a grade-a retard.





I don't care about american politics, really, as I live in the UK - but that troll-faced old slapper is simply annoying.
Hunting from a helicopter is hardly hunting. It's more like shooting fish in a barrel. When you compare Hillary and Sarah as possible Presidential material it's like comparing Lucille Ball with Susan Sontag.
Is it really fair to hunt a wild animal from a helicopter? If you are going to hunt, do it fair and square -- on the ground, face to face. (It doesn't seem very economical either...)
completely irrelevant and as an avid hunter there is nothing wrong with it but im not going into that...the last thing a election in the US needs to become is a popularity contest. We don't need animal activists running our country
No it's not. If you actually did some research on it, you would understand why. They were killing predators to protect caribou and moose from getting attacked.
I want her running and hiding in the snow and me in the helicopter.
She did not hunt from a helicopter, you need to pull your head out of Obamas azz long enough to go to fact check.org
No why should it? Hunting is a way of life and a hobby for a lot of people
I regard HER as an overall negative in the campaign.
Not to me, but it is for a lot of Dems.
if it has a heater what a great way to hunt

No comments:

Post a Comment