Friday, February 12, 2010

Have the conservatives added Chelsea Clinton to their mud-slinging campaign strategy?

They should be careful because I suspect that this young lady is going to be a very prominent person in future politics. In exercising her right to free speech, she was a mite harsh in her response to a question about her parent's work, regarding an exposed marital problem. I think it caught her off-guard, and we all, at times, wish we had re-phrased something! I do admire her inherited intellect, and otherwise, she has been very respectful to everyone. But, even so, I like Obama better.Have the conservatives added Chelsea Clinton to their mud-slinging campaign strategy?
The whole situation is really tacky. She's working for her mother's campaign, and should be asked tough questions regarding Hillary Clinton's public career. But no one should EVER have to answer questions about their parents' sex lives. And the press just keeps on asking.Have the conservatives added Chelsea Clinton to their mud-slinging campaign strategy?
If you didn't notice, she threw the first stones at Republicans. She basically opened herself up to being shown that she is hypocrite. No one would have said anything about her involvement with the banking mess if she was not throwing mud.
No.


Those were Obama Supporters, little girl.


Didn't you watch the news?





They were right to ask the questions.


She was wrong, and still Ugly.


Even after all her plastic surgery.
In case you do not know it, Chelsea is 30 years old, and is stumping for her Mother. She has entered the political ring, and can not feel that she is immune from hard questions from both sides of the isle. By the way, the first question about her Mothers reaction about her Father's favorite sport was from a Democrat, not a Republican!
If she can't stand the heat, she should get out of the kitchen. She's playing with the big boys now.
Maybe. They still hate Obama more. I support Hillary, but I don't understand why people are making deal out of this. Asking about the Monica Lewinsky case is NOT appropriate for this campaign, AT ALL! Nothing to do with the running for the White House.
She should have stay out of the picture = more respect from real Liberals





Supporting her mom = losing the respect of many liberals who wanted to CHANGE the corruptions in the US government = her mom
Sorry to break your bubble, but the very first guy that asked Chelsea about the Clinton-Lewinsky affair was a Democrat. The guy was interview on TV and he admitted he is Democrat. So you can see Conservatives are not the only ones.......!!!
The sad truth is that people like Ann Coulter and her counterparts know no boundaries, therefore if Hillary is the nominee, Chelsea will be subjected to a great deal of mud slinging.
What have the ';conservatives'; said? Do tell.





I think once you stick your neck out into the arena of politics your fair game! She is more of a mud collector, than a target I suspect. But I didn't realive the conservitive ';right wing conspiracy'; group had gotten together to launch a formal campaign. An individual did ask her about her fathers infidelity, which she blew off, unlike her mother who if she had been doing the blowing off, their would not have been a coment to blow off. Well that sounded better in my head than on screen, anyway, politics is a ruff and tumble area to dabble in, and if you don't want mud splattered on you, put down the mic, get off the stage, and go back to your cushy job.
using people children to make political points is pretty damn low and exactly what id expect off the republican propaganda campaign
Chelsea is playing in the big leagues now. She should be prepared for as such. You don't run on the field on game day without having practiced at all, do you? The bottom line is, our society is very real and she should expect real questions from real people. The integrity of her mom was not what was in question here. (which is why I feel she got so defensive) However... her father's GLOBAL sex scandal and how that would affect her mother's current campaign, was questioned. And in my opinion, a valid and reasonable question. It's not as if she was asked about any details of the affair, or how she or her mother feels about it. If she didn't know what to say, I feel it would have been more tactful to simply say ';That's a question you'd have to ask her.'; and taken the high road.
THANK YOU, P S ! But Arlene, I would like to point out, that the 'REPS' could NOT sling any more 'mud' than what the DEMS are doing,, TO THEMSELVES !!!! My GOD, THEY'RE A JOKE !!


(are we 'under sniper fire' again???) Chelsea should have been asked if she was EMBARASSED by the lies her parents throw out to the public.


Her ';inherited intellect';,? WTF is THAT ???


She's a dimwit with a ';degree'; paid for WITH GOVERNMENT $$ and if she ';can't handle the truth';, then she should haul her butt out of the race. Is she going to tell EVERYBODY, ';none of your business';? when they ask her a question she does'nt like ? She better get smarter than that, because that answer will not fly much longer.


Your wise to go with Obama, but you would be a hell of a lot SMARTER to go with McCain !!!! (This time !)


P S is right !!!
No


The question was ask was Hillary's creditability hurt by the mess Bill made in the sexual harassment case brought up by Paula Jones.





Remember it was Bill that smear Paula's name.


It wasn't about a BJ it was Bill obstructing justice and preventing a woman having her day in court.





It was also Hillary who got on National TV and declare it was all a vast right wing conspiracy later her house of cards cave in.





That does go to the heart of her creditability and that is a fair question.





One more thing the cowards that she is in front of are hand pick by Hillary.


So most likely that guy was a democrat.





The GOP don't have to do any mud slinging because the DNC is doing a bang up job on their own.
Yes I have...she is a horse faced bag of lying socialist excrement just like her parents....She should have been prepared for that question, and could have been more diplomatic, instead she turned nasty....just like her Mom.





She's been part of a political family her whole life...she knows how things go...she put herself out there...and her parents ';marital problem'; involved the President of the USA lying under oath....she is a not a baby!
they should shes a stupid kid using I am a child as some sort of shield against real questions.

No comments:

Post a Comment